COVER-UP: ‘Unraveling The Shadows’, The Covert Games Behind COVID-19 Origins – By Justin Hart

Source – covidreason.substack.com

  • “…Despite years of relentless investigation, the COVID beast’s birthplace remains shrouded in secrecy. However, one absolute stands firm in this quagmire: there was a colossal cover-up. Tony Fauci, academic scientists, even prestigious science journals were all implicated in deceiving the public”

Unraveling the Shadows: The Covert Games behind COVID-19 Origins

JUSTIN HART

When adrenaline strikes my veins, a thrilling, yet sometimes unnerving rush flushes over me. That sensation? It’s striking me now, as TableMag and other have broken ground on an evolving story that seems to have more shadowy corners than a murder mystery. We have all become unwilling players in the deadly drama of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we may have received the most chilling twist yet.

The story unfolds like this: a senior CIA officer blew the whistle, suggesting that six of the CIA’s seven virus inquisition specialists were convinced that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab in Wuhan. These experts had high confidence, and then—boom! They fell mysteriously silent after receiving hush money from the CIA. The six “financially incentivized” experts dialed back their certainty about the pandemic’s origin. CIA strikes back, denying the allegations, but the Pandora’s box is already ajar.

Despite years of relentless investigation, the COVID beast’s birthplace remains shrouded in secrecy. However, one absolute stands firm in this quagmire: there was a colossal cover-up. Tony Fauci, academic scientists, even prestigious science journals were all implicated in deceiving the public.

Now, amidst all this confusion, speculation emerges around why the CIA might want to bury the notion of a China-born virus. The finger of accusation points towards USAID, America’s foreign aid agency. Their funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and affinity with the CIA tips the scales of suspicion.

But wait, it gets murkier. As if pulled straight from a spy novel, it looks like not only did USAID fund the now-infamous Wuhan lab, there are allegations that CIA was trying to sway official opinions of the pandemic’s origin. Like cobwebs in a haunted house, the ties appear to reach far and deep into the military-industrial complex and, of course, China.

Deep within this perplexing intertwining of virus research, military-industrial complex, and China lies an NGO called EcoHealth Alliance. It funneled millions of taxpayer dollars through funding from the famous trio – National Institute of Health, the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, and USAID. A whopping $64.7 million from USAID ends up with EcoHealth Alliance, and at least $1.1 million finds its way to the notorious Wuhan lab, a key player in the coronavirus saga.

Care to venture into more treacherous terrain? Intersect the virus research with the military-industrial complex and China, and you see something akin to a mirrored maze. A cycle of accusations and denials spins around, weaving a dizzying tale of its own. The wheel does turn, dear reader, and it’s seemingly spinning out of control.

Exploring the ties presents a haunting vision – the specter of a government willing to risk a scandal by concealing evidence from a lab tied with Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Now compound that with the media falling into the cover-up regime, reinforcing the narrative that a lab leak was but a conspiracy theory. In all this upheaval, the attempts to quieten the murmurings were all too evident, leading one to confront the chilling reality of professional power intricately twisted with authorities, media, intelligence, and science.

This is not your everyday bedtime story, nor is it some elaborate conspiracy theory created to fuel paranoid minds. This is hard, cold evidence of power playing hide and seek with the truth. But remember, as Rudyard Kipling said in his acclaimed novel Kim, “the wheel turns, and turns again.” It’s only a matter of time before the truth reveals itself for all to see. The underlying question remains, however: are we ready to face the reality of it?