Source – naomiwolf.substack.com
- “…The island used to be thronged with the rhythms of people whose crossing of one another’s paths was like a flirtatious dance. There was a beat to the city — the human beat of sexuality and creativity and joy. Men and women — women and women, men and men — now barely looked at one another. That dance of attraction, that flash of flirtation, that sideways glance that the streets of Manhattan always yielded between passing strangers and have done since the city began — the play of sexuality itself — was so subdued or diluted as to be hard to sense or see at all”
Lipid Nanoparticles: Are They Subtly Changing Human Beings?
Are Essential Human Qualities Being Destroyed by PEG-Coated Industrial Fats?
By Naomi Wolf
Some of my essays are grounded in politics, the economy, the material world. Others reference the medical and scientific insights of the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, along with other principled medical and scientific experts.
This one asks questions. Please read it in that spirit.
The spike protein haunts some of the good “dissident doctors” and honest scientists. The mRNA fragments, for their part, profoundly disturb others; and all for good reasons.
But it is the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the mRNA injections that keep me up nights, feeling that the dystopia on earth has now fully arrived. And the reasons for that includes questions that border on the metaphysical; as the LNPs, it seems to me, are able to negatively affect the very essence of our humanity.
I recently had the bizarre experience of going to Manhattan after a wave of “boosters” had been rolled out. I remember standing on a crowded rooftop bar on top of a boutique hotel; attractive couples flirted at tabletops; singles crowded the cocktail area; the sun shone, and everything looked normal. But I kept having the disconcerting sense that I was standing inside a hologram. I could not figure out what was wrong, until I realized — it looked like a crowd, but it did not feel like a crowd. I could see the people, of course, all around me, but I could not feel that dense, joyful, passionate, sparky, fractious energy of a human crowd, pre-2020.
I checked on what it felt like while walking on the city streets, and my impression was confirmed. There they were, the usual Manhattan throngs, surging along the sidewalks — but they were like pictures, like brightly dressed ghosts. The massive energy field —that sense of an island as a pulsing human generator, the electricity that had galvanized generations of newcomers to Manhattan — that was simply gone.
Not only was that overall energy gone. I noticed too that, as Jamie Glazov and I discussed recently on his podcast, the “mojo”, the sexual energy, of Manhattan’s crowds, was gone as well.
The island used to be thronged with the rhythms of people whose crossing of one another’s paths was like a flirtatious dance. There was a beat to the city — the human beat of sexuality and creativity and joy.
Men and women — women and women, men and men — now barely looked at one another. That dance of attraction, that flash of flirtation, that sideways glance that the streets of Manhattan always yielded between passing strangers and have done since the city began — the play of sexuality itself — was so subdued or diluted as to be hard to sense or see at all.
I walked into restaurants and hotels, and the formerly beautiful young women tasked with greeting visitors, looked like dancers in a scene out of a 19th-century Dance Macabre. They were uniformly pale, or yellowish, or had a grey cast to their complexions; they had circles under their eyes. The glow of good circulation, the radiance of health and sexual energy, all of which have been considered attractive for as long as humans have been courting — was gone.
Crowds themselves were altered. Young adults were limping, at scale. Men and women in their forties and fifties, who looked as if they had been recently healthy, were now moving like eighty year olds. People in vast numbers, of all ages, walked as if it was hurting them to move. Even teenagers and older children moved like zombies or robots — drifting, with seemingly no energy to spare. Smaller children did not squirm or race around. They sat vacantly on park benches or in restaurants. Or they drifted like little wraiths beside their parents, focussed on nothing.
What happened? What happened to humanity?
Many have described their loved ones being altered in some indefinable ways, after they have been injected with mRNA vaccinations.
People have spoken to me in distress about how they can’t seem to feel the physical presence of their loved ones, post-vaccination.
It looks like the same person, they say with grief, if a bit paler, a bit more fatigued and ethereal.
But it doesn’t feel like the same person.
Their thinking may be more rigid, their loved ones report sadly. They may be emotionally brutal. Attachments can seem less passionate. Hugs more chilly.
Body workers and physical therapists have spoken about their vaccinated patients’ temperature being now altered, their blood flow patterns changed, even their “energy fields,” as they put it, being drained or weakened (hey, I am from California).
This essay asks questions about what could possibly cause inchoate changes in people post-mRNA vaccination and asks whether the lipid nanoparticles themselves may be profoundly altering human beings. Again, I am not proposing answers here, but simply exploring possibilities.
We know the physical cost of lipid nanoparticles, due to some recent pioneering research.
We know, for instance, that lipid nanoparticles cause inflammation. Dr. Robert Chandler of the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers re-established that, and it is also a fact that has been known for years. [https://www.globalresearch.ca/pfizer-used-dangerous-assumptions-rather-than-research-guess-outcomes/5788718].
We know that the LNPs, which their manufacturers boast can cross every membrane in the human body, cross the placenta, as fetal-maternal medicine OB/GYN Dr. James Thorp has demonstrated. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/yWNotidgaGfO/].This is one reason the lies to pregnant women of pharmaceutical, medical, and government spokesmodels, in swearing that the mRNA injection ingredients could not cross the placenta, are so egregious.
We know that the LNPs do cross the blood-brain barrier — indeed, they were designed to do that: some of their earliest medical uses involved the delivery of medicine across the blood-brain barrier, to target brain tumors. [https://news.feinberg.northwestern.edu/2017/07/12/nanomedicine-opens-door-to-precision-medicine-for-brain-tumors]
We know that Pfizer partnered this year with Acuitas Therapeutics, a private company based in Vancouver, Canada, which manufactured lipid nanoparticles, to bring ten more mRNA-LNP-based vaccines into the market:
‘“Our swift delivery of the world’s first mRNA-LNP-based vaccine made clear the promise of mRNA-LNP technology,” said Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer and President, Worldwide Research, Development and Medical of Pfizer Inc. “We are making significant investments to harness the power of the mRNA-LNP technology and deliver potential new breakthrough vaccines and therapeutics that address significant unmet needs for patients. This agreement expands our LNP capabilities and allows us to explore more projects within our existing vaccines area and new therapeutic areas where mRNA-LNP technology holds potential for success.” “Acuitas is extremely proud that its LNP technology contributes to the success of COMIRNATY® and is excited to be working with Pfizer to advance new vaccines,” said Acuitas Therapeutics’ CEO, Dr. Thomas Madden.
[https://acuitastx.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Acuitas-Pfizer-Agreement-Release.pdf].
So:
Industrial fats treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) can cross every membrane in the human body. Including the brain.
What could possibly go wrong?
My own aversion to LNPs — an aversion that led me not to choose to receive an mRNA injection — arose from simply reading on various LNP production and distribution websites, how still-experimental, and how weirdly off-the-shelf, this material is: you can order lipid nanoparticles, just as you can order polyethylene glycol, from various supply companies who will “partner” with manufacturers, few questions asked, in drug or experiment formulation. “Creative Biolabs” is one such:
“Features of Our Services
- One-stop and customizable LNPs preparation
- The scalable proprietary manufacturing process
- High-cost performance
Please contact us for more information.”
[https://mrna.creative-biolabs.com/lipid-nanoparticle.htm]
I am an English major. I am not a medical doctor.
But even I can see possible serious problems in relation to humanity being saturated, via every membrane, with lipid nanoparticles. Human beings are more than our bodies. So this is a massive experiment on the very essence of what makes us human.
Lipid nanoparticles are not medicines. They are a delivery system.
In the case of the mRNA injections, the LNPs are coated with four lipids including PEG, a petroleum byproduct. PEG is a thickening agent, that is in laxatives, and in creams and cosmetics. [https://davidsuzuki.org/living-green/dirty-dozen-peg-compounds-contaminants/#:~:text=PEGs%20(polyethylene%20glycols)%20are%20petroleum,used%20as%20cosmetic%20cream%20bases.].
Many people have noticed that their loved ones in remission from cancer, or whose cancers were long resolved and now in the past, have suffered resurgences of raging cancers post-vaccination.
PEG, according to the David Suzuki Foundation, and other critics of chemical additives, is a carcinogen:
“Depending on manufacturing processes, PEGs may be contaminated with measurable amounts of ethylene oxide and 1,4-dioxane. i The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies ethylene oxide as a known human carcinogen and 1,4-dioxane as a possible human carcinogen. Ethylene oxide can also harm the nervous system ii and the California Environmental Protection Agency has classified it as a developmental toxicant based on evidence that it may interfere with human development. iii 1,4-dioxane is also persistent. In other words, it doesn’t easily degrade and can remain in the environment long after it is rinsed down the shower drain. 1,4-dioxane can be removed from cosmetics during the manufacturing process by vacuum stripping, but there is no easy way for consumers to know whether products containing PEGs have undergone this process. iv In a study of personal care products marketed as ‘natural’ or ‘organic’ (uncertified), U.S. researchers found 1,4-dioxane as a contaminant in 46 of 100 products analyzed.
While carcinogenic contaminants are the primary concern, PEG compounds themselves show some evidence of genotoxicity […] and if used on broken skin can cause irritation and systemic toxicity. viii The industry panel that reviews the safety of cosmetics ingredients concluded that some PEG compounds are not safe for use on damaged skin (although the assessment generally approved of the use of these chemicals in cosmetics). ix Also, PEG functions as a “penetration enhancer,” increasing the permeability of the skin to allow greater absorption of the product — including harmful ingredients.”
So with an mRNA vaccine, you are getting lipid nanoparticles, that are crossing every membrane in the human body — and that are coated with a potential carcinogen [https://www.hellonaturalliving.com/what-are-pegs-2/] — traversing your bloodstream and lodging in the organs in your body.
Can this hurt your heart?
A thoroughly ignored March 2022 study from Metabolism Open Journal, “Potential implications of lipid nanoparticles in the pathogenesis of myocarditis associated with the use of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2” [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936821000839], made the very reasonable case that myocarditis could be caused by the lipid nanoparticle sheath on the mRNA vaccines. (COVID Spike Protein is also documented to cause this kind of damage). [https://www.dicardiology.com/content/coronavirus-spike-protein-activated-natural-immune-response-damaged-heart-muscle-cells].
The 2021-22 Hong Kong study of mRNA injections in mice, “Intravenous Injection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model,”the one that I use as Exhibit A in my argument that the mRNA injections are a CCP-overseen and manufactured bioweapon [https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/11/1933/6353927; https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab707], showed visible white patches on the hearts of mice post-second vaccination. What is causing those white patches?
According to anecdotal reports from medical workers, the hearts and lungs of severely vaccine-injured patients are also showing white patches and even “crystallizations.” The blood clotting problems faced by the vaccinated are now well established, and blood clots and thrombocytopenia abound in the Pfizer documents. Many reasonable hypotheses have been presented for the vascular and blood damage in mRNA vaccinated people, but the industrial-fats nature of the LNPs haunt me: could these harms be affected or even possibly be caused by something as basic and mechanical as the unstable, clumping LNPs? [https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/why-would-a-covid-vaccine-cause-rare-blood-clots-researchers-have-found-clues].
A casual aside that disturbs me considerably, in many peer-reviewed studies of nanoparticle medicine, is that many kinds of LNPs are solid at room and body temperature. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323428637000049].
Some LNPs that are solid at room temperature, are liquid when chilled. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0378517394003478].
Is the instability of LNPs as dependent on temperature, affecting human beings?
I do not know if any of this variation in solidity and temperature is germane to the mRNA vaccines — there is so much we do not know; but the fact that both the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA injections had, at the rollout, to be kept super-chilled — between -20° and -70° Celsius, the latter “colder than Antarctica” — has had various mushy, ever-changing explanations.
This November 2020 National Public Radio (NPR) article, for instance, explains the need for ultra-cold temperatures as having to do both with the mRNA and with the LNPs. It quotes Margaret Liu, of the International Society for Vaccines:
‘“Here’s an analogy: Think of the vaccine as a chocolate bar that melts easily. Just as there are ways to keep the chocolate from melting into goo, there are things the drugmakers did to protect their COVID-19 vaccines.”’ The first step, Liu says, was to modify the mRNA nucleosides — the “building blocks” of the RNA vaccine. ‘”They’ve used modified versions because those are more stable,”‘ she says.
The next step was to use lipid nanoparticles, which, Dr Liu explains, ‘”…is kind of like putting your chocolate inside a candy coating — you have an M&M, so the chocolate doesn’t melt.”
But even with the stabilized building blocks and lipid coating, the mRNA could still fall apart easily, which is why the vaccine is frozen.”’ [https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/11/17/935563377/why-does-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-need-to-be-kept-colder-than-antarctica]
Dr. Margaret Liu is not some random physician, cited by NPR. She is Chairman of the Board of the International Society for Vaccines. As her LinkedIn profile notes:
“Dr. Liu is known as ‘The Mother of DNA Vaccines’ a vaccine technology that paved the way for authorized COVID mRNA vaccines and which is licensed for veterinary applications and is considered crucial for addressing diseases which emerge due to pathogens that cross between humans and animals (One Health). She was instrumental in establishing the WHO Initiative for Vaccine Research, was on the committee that wrote WHO regulatory guidelines for DNA vaccines, and is the scientific lead for the WHO group drafting recommendations for mRNA vaccines.”
Dr Liu is also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Indeed, she is the Senior Advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on the billion dollars that the Foundation invested in — vaccines: [https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Ideas/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2000/10/Margaret-Lui-MD-New-Senior-Advisor]
And…Dr. Liu is herself a holder of multiple vaccine patents:
“After leading vaccine and gene therapy research at two companies and filing various patents, Margaret was asked to be the senior advisor in vaccinology for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This, as well as helping establish the World Health Organization’s Initiative for Vaccine Research, enabled her to expand from developing technologies for global vaccines to the broader arena of global health.”
So — Dr. Liu is advising the WHO, that is funded by China, and also by Bill Gates: “The Gates Foundation is the second-largest contributor to the WHO. As of September 2021, it had invested investing nearly $780 million in its programs this year.” [https://qz.com/2102889/the-who-is-too-dependent-on-gates-foundation-donations/].
Dr. Liu advises the WHO on mRNA vaccines, which are manufactured in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with China — per my Substack “Facing the Beast” — and which are using intellectual property (IP) now transferred, per BioNTech’s SEC filing, to China.
Thus, Dr. Liu, funded by Bill Gates, and advising Bill Gates on his billion-dollar investment in vaccines; is also advocating to NPR, a US government news agency, for the use of mRNA vaccines, which are paid for by the US government, a payment that then profits China and — Bill Gates….
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/lipid-nanoparticles-are-they-subtly
RIELPOLITIK 
Pingback: ALTERED STATES: ‘Lipid Nanoparticles’, Are They Subtly Changing Human Beings? – Dr. Naomi Wolf — RIELPOLITIK – Typography