THE PEDO-FILE: ‘Dark Past’, Germany’s Secret Pedophilia Experiments (Archive)

Source –

“…Reports detail the horrific experiences of the teenage boys at the time, who were repeatedly sexually abused by their foster guardian…Victims from this utterly horrifying practice have filed a lawsuit exposing the grotesque details of this taxpayer-funded pedophilia experiment”

Germany’s Secret Pedophilia Experiments

A sickening and bizarre sexual experiment was carried out by German government officials and a pedophile scientist that deliberately placed troubled children in the care of pedophiles to see if it had “positive consequences.” Victims from this utterly horrifying practice have filed a lawsuit exposing the grotesque details of this taxpayer-funded pedophilia experiment.

Germany’s Secret Pedophilia Experiments

Kentler Experiments

In 1969, the Berlin welfare authorities assigned Dr Helmut Kentler, head of the department of social pedagogy at the Pedagogical Center, at least three homeless teenagers for foster care, who were then assigned to known pedophile parents by Kentler.

Astonishingly, he had been able to convince the West Berlin Senate that pedophilia could have “Positive consequences” and could help homeless children lead “Proper, unremarkable lives.” These experiments, called the Kentler experiments, were carried on from 1969 to 2003.

Helmut Kentler. Neue Presse

The U.S. Sun identifies three victims under the Kentler experiments – Ulrich, Marco and Svenalong with one abuser Fritz. Reports detail the horrific experiences of the teenage boys at the time, who were repeatedly sexually abused by their foster guardian.
Kentler described the beginning of his sinister project in a magazine from 1980:

11 years ago, I was living in a group in Berlin at the time – 13-year-old Ulrich was brought to me… Ulrich’s advantage was that he looked good and that he enjoyed sex; so he could give something back to paedophile men who looked after him. We were lucky with Mr. Winter (The foster guardian assigned to Ulrich by Kentler). But surely my regular visits had a positive effect. Because relationships between adults and adolescents often suffer from the fact that they have to hide and hide.

Although Kentler admitted before his death in 2008 that it was clear to all involved that placing youths with pedophiles broke the law, his papers described the entire experiment as a “Success.”

Researchers into the shameful episode getting stalled

In 2013, political scientist Franz Walter from the Göttingen Institute for Democracy Research examined previous position of the German political parties the Greens and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) on pedophilia and assigned Kentler a key role in the networks of pedophile activists.

Professor Franz Walter, Göttingen Institute for Democracy Research

With rising public exposure and pressure, Dr Teresa Nentwig of the University of Göttingen was then commissioned by the Berlin State authorities in 2015 to review the city files and publish a report on the findings.

A press release by the Leibniz University Hannover acknowledges Dr. Nentwig’s “Comprehensive review,” of Helmut Kentler’s work at the university and admits that Kentler was a professor at the University of Hannover as late as 1996.

“His statements and research conduct are inexcusable and utterly unacceptable. Leibniz University Hannover explicitly disassociates itself from Helmut Kentler and his work,” said the press release.

An online petition of September, 2019 by Joana Hendl explains that although the matter was brought to a public debate in the Berlin Senate in 2015, there was an intense coverup behind the scenes. Kentler’s files from his apartment, files from the youth welfare office were confiscated in order to stop the investigation.

A Dark Past – Pedophilia was getting institutionalized support

Germany is no stranger to such horrific scandals.

The junior coalition party of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling conservatives, Germany’s business-friendly Free Democratic Party (FDP), has had a strong connection with pedophile movements in recent history.

This Spiegel International reports that the FDP had connections even to those highest up in the pedophilia movement. There were numerous links and instances of close association between politicians and pedophilia.

At its general assembly in March 1980, the FDP’s youth organization at the time, the Young Democrats, wanted to remove paragraphs 174 and 176, which forbade sexual abuse of children and teenagers from the German Criminal Code.

A campaign ad for the FDP ahead of Berlin’s 1981 state parliament election obtained government funding for the General Homosexual Working Group (AHA), which at the time was not just advocating for urgent decriminalization of homosexuality, it was also a lobbying group for pedophiles.

In May 1981, the FDP’s parliamentary group gathered for a hearing to explore repealing paragraph 175, which made homosexuality a crime. 11 experts were called, including Helmut Kentler, who went on to make an unopposed presentation on his pedophile fostering experiments in Berlin.

In November of 1982, the FDP threw a party at the close of its federal convention. The invitations promising “Disco and discussion” went out not only to party members who had participated in the convention in Berlin, but also to a selection of gays, lesbians and pedophiles. The invitation bore the FDP logo, emblazoned at the bottom right, and explicitly welcomed “Lesbians and Liberals, Gossips and Sisters, Celebrities and Pederasts.”

In 1980, the highly active German Study and Working Group on Pedophilia (DSAP) shared a post office box with the Humanistic Union (HU) in Düsseldorf. The HU, which describes itself as an “independent civil rights organization,” also had a longstanding problematic position on the issue of pedophilia, maintaining close contact with the Working Group on Human Sexuality (AHS), which advocated the legalization of sex between adults and children.

Sociology professor RüdigerLautmann, who still serves on the board of HU and had also made a presentation in May 1981 to the FDP on repealing paragraph 175. Lautmann, told the parliamentarians that contemporary beliefs concerning “Age differences, the behaviour of the younger party and the nature of the sexual contact” were entirely incorrect.

Jurgen Trittin, a prominent Green Party member, supported pedophilia back in the day

Jurgen Trittin, a prominent Green Party member, supported pedophilia back in the day as well. Trittin later issued a grovelling apology, saying that the pedophile links had to be seen in the context of the sexual revolution of the 1970s, which encouraged a “Fiction that there could be sexual relations between adults and children beyond violence or abuse of trust.”

The Lawsuit

Because no individual guilt could be found by law, and both Kentler and the abuser of foster children are no longer alive, the prosecutors dropped the investigation of two of the victims against the Youth Senate Department of Berlin.

According to Der Tagesspiegel, the two victims are now in line to receive compensation for their civil suit from the Berlin Senate, which agreed to an out-of-court settlement. One of the victim’s lawyers was reportedly pressing for a lump sum of €100,000 plus a monthly pension of €2,500.

Berlin Youth Affairs Minister, Sandra Scheeres said, “It was a crime to put these people into this kind of care. It is simply unimaginable that something like this happened with state oversight.” The Berliner Zeitung daily has urged the minister to keep up the pressure on the Kentler affair and “Get all the files on the table.”

Ms. Sandra Scheeres awarded a second research contract as the initial report had not been able to adequately clarify the problem due to the lack of the necessary rights to inspect files. A second report was being drawn up by the University of Hildesheim.

Germany’s Secret Pedophilia Experiments

2 thoughts on “THE PEDO-FILE: ‘Dark Past’, Germany’s Secret Pedophilia Experiments (Archive)

    “The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe ~ whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists ~ we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.” ~ Herman Wouk

    We will legally define the Talmud as the basis of the Israeli legal system. ~ Benjamin Netanyahu


    The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.
    The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

    “THE JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time.


    The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions.
    — Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson (1)

    Or consider this from The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, in the entry


    The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.

    Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.
    — R. Travers Herford for the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. (2)

    Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein, Instructor of Talmud, and later president of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, writes:

    Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew reads his prayers, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement and Passover Eve, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies.
    — Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein (3)

    “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”

    “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
    (footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”

    “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood(a dildo).”
    (footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”

    SANHEDRIN, 69b
    “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s