THE 9/11 PSY-OPERA: ‘Atta Boy’, Mohamed Atta Is Everywhere (Flashback)

Source –

  • “…For reasons I’ve already discussed, it is extremely unlikely that the Mohamed Atta born in Egypt could be the same Mohamed Atta who hijacked the plane. The Mohamed Atta who hijacked the plane could be the same Mohamed Atta who was in Montgomery, Alabama, and may have used the Atta name and identity while attending Officer’s Training School in order to reinforce his identity as a pilot”

SM: …My personally favorite is the Mohomed Atta that had a Stripper for a girlfriend & snorted copious amounts of nose candy….

Mohamed Atta is everywhere:

Reconstituez le dépotoir - Page 3 - Taverne - DEPOTOIR.CA
(Added By SM)
  1. The original, and in my mind still the best, Mohamed Atta is the piously religious architecture student born in Egypt and last seen in Hamburg, Germany. He, and two of the other alleged terrorists, had their passports stolen in Germany in 1999. It is interesting that this has been explained as their way of getting new passports, free of any stamps that would hurt their chances of obtaining U. S. visas. On the other hand, if their passports were really stolen, that might be the time when the identity theft began that has led to there being so much confusion.
  2. The evil imposter Mohamed Atta is the guy who played Mohamed Atta in the United States and piloted a plane into the World Trade Center.
  3. There is a Mohamed Atta who attended International Officer’s School in Montgomery, Alabama.
  4. There is a Mohamed Atta who received U.S. military training, intended for members of foreign military services, in how to use E-2 Hawkeye radar aircraft at Norfolk Naval Air Station in Virginia.
  5. There is a Mohamed Atta who is said to have met with a high-ranking representative of Cuban intelligence in the spring of 1999.
  6. There is a Mohamed Atta who apparently spent many months in Afghanistan, possibly training at bin Laden camps in 1999 or 2000.
  7. There is a Mohamed Atta who apparently held himself out as having some family connection to the Royal House of Saud, making him a Saudi Prince!
  8. There is a Mohamed Atta who is said to be an Arab-American originally from Ramallah who was implicated in a series of bus bombings in Jerusalem in 1996!
  9. There is a Mohamed Atta who supposedly met with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague (this meeting has now been officially denied, probably because Atta would have to be in three places at the same time rather than only two, but some people refuse to give it up). It is even possible that the man who met with the Iraqi in Prague was a Pakistani named, you guessed it, Mohamed Atta!
  10. There is an older Atta who was originally confused in press reports with the Mohamed Atta who concerns us. This older Atta may be a terrorist named Mahmoud Mahmoud Atta who attacked a bus in Israel in 1986 and whose current whereabouts are unknown.
  11. There is a Dr. Mohamed Atta, who may have been confused with the hijacker Mohamed Atta when Dr. Atta’s early September 2001 visit to New York City was thought to be a recon mission by the hijacker.
Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamed Atta & the 9-11 Cover-up in ...
(Added By SM)

For reasons I’ve already discussed, it is extremely unlikely that the Mohamed Atta born in Egypt could be the same Mohamed Atta who hijacked the plane. The Mohamed Atta who hijacked the plane could be the same Mohamed Atta who was in Montgomery, Alabama, and may have used the Atta name and identity while attending Officer’s Training School in order to reinforce his identity as a pilot. The hijacker could also have studied in Virginia. The architecture student Mohamed Atta could not possibly have been in any Officer’s Training School, but might have been the Mohamed Atta who went to Afghanistan (given the vagueness of the Afghanistan story, I suppose they all could have vacationed together in Afghanistan). The architure student Mohamed Atta is very unlikely to have met with anyone in the United States in 1999, as even the Official Story holds that Mohamed Atta only arrived in the United States from Europe in June 2000 (although he may have already been in the United States at least as early as April 2000). It is difficult to see how hijacker Mohamed Atta could have met with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague unless he has mastered the art of being in two places at the same time (of course, someone calling himself ‘Mohamed Atta’ might very well have met with an Iraqi in Prague). The Mohamed Atta who blew up the bus appears to be too old to be the hijacker or the architecture student. I don’t know what to make of the Saudi Prince or Ramallah stories. Finally, Dr. Atta has nothing to do with any terrorism or any of the other people calling themselves ‘Atta’, but it is very instructive that such identification errors were made in the investigation.

the deskrat chronicles: mad cow morning news' interview of ...
(Added By SM)

Monday, May 27, 2002

John O’Neill was the former FBI agent who died in one of the WTC towers. He has been depicted as a hero who died when, after he escaped from his office in one tower, he went back into the other to try to rescue people. He has also been depicted as someone who quit the FBI in frustration at not being allowed by the Bush Administration to continue his investigations of the bin Laden family. It is the ultimate irony that he became head of security for the WTC, and died in what is supposed to be an attack by bin Laden. However, when I passed my invisible conspiracy coincidence meter over O’Neill, the dial started spinning so quickly that it broke. Consider the following:

  1. When I think of FBI agents, I think of boring bureaucrats living in the suburbs, driving minivans to work. John O’Neill had his own table at Elaine’s in New York City, smoked cigars with people like Robert De Niro, and lived the life of the CEO of a large company or someone high up in the entertainment business. On top of all that, he had both a family with his wife and a family with his long-term girlfriend. On top of that, he had other girlfriends, who he managed to keep unknown to his wife or his long-term girlfriend. How did he manage all this on an FBI salary? Is it possible he was doing some freelance work on the side? He reminds me of FBI Agent Kemper Boyd in James Ellroy’s great novel American Tabloid (which captures the feeling of the type of things that were going on at the time of the JFK assassination better than anything else I’ve read), who for want of money ends up working for everybody, a situation which doesn’t end well for him either.
  2. O’Neill was apparently the creator of the politically convenient but highly questionable theory that TWA 800 was brought down by the ignition of leaking fuel and not by a terrorist or U. S. Navy missile. This is the kind of theory a political operative comes up with, not a regular FBI agent.
  3. O’Neill was up for promotion, but his chances were derailed when it became known that he was responsible for a security breach. Apparently he was attending a retirement seminar in Tampa, and lost a briefcase containing documents of a security level that he shouldn’t have been carrying there. The briefcase and documents were recovered (with some of his personal effects missing), but the breach of security went on his employment record and he may have felt it was used as an excuse to deny him the promotion when it was really denied because his aggressive approach to his job, particularly his investigation of the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, wasn’t univerally appreciated in the Bush Administration or the FBI. Maybe I’m stretching here, but this security breach took place in the summer of 2000, at a time and a place just north of where Atta and other hijackers were taking flying lessons. With his prospects at the FBI or elsewhere in a Bush-led government limited, and his frustration at not being allowed to do his job in investigating the bin Laden family because of oil, O’Neill was all too happy to resign from the FBI and take a much higher paying job as head of security for the WTC.
  4. The infamous ‘Phoenix memorandum’, the one prepared by the FBI that apparently states fears that suspected al-Qaeda operatives were taking flight training in the United States to prepare for terror attacks, was sent to only two people, or perhaps to only a dozen people, one of whom was John O’Neill. He reads it, and almost immediately takes a job with Silverstein Properties as head of security for the WTC (and dies on his second day of work!). So let me get this straight: the director of counterterrorism for the FBI’s New York office and the FBI’s main expert on bin Laden, knowing that al-Qaeda had already tried to blow up the WTC and had operatives who had expressed a desire to complete the job (O’Neill had recently said to a friend: “They’ll never stop trying to take down those two buildings”), reads a memo suggesting that al-Qaeda operatives may be taking flight training in the United States (and whatever the Bush administration may claim about its knowledge of al-Qaeda plans to use hijacked planes as missiles, you can be sure that John O’Neill was fully aware of it), and immediately quits to be head of security at the WTC! (I’m sorry, but this is where the dial on my coincidence meter just exploded.) I’d really like to know how it was arranged for him to get this job, and whether he was actually working for more than one employer at the time of his death.

I don’t know what all this means, but I know it means something. For example, what if he didn’t really quit the FBI (the last thing he did before heading back to the other tower was to telephone FBI headquarters), but was posted at his new job to stop what was described to him as inside security breaches at the WTC (planting of bombs, etc., or an attack like the 1993 attack using bombs in a vehicle)? Presumably he wouldn’t have agreed to work at the WTC after reading the Phoenix memorandum unless he was assured that the plane missile issue was being taken care of. I am very suspicious that there is more to the story of John O’Neill than we are being told.

Why did Mohamed Atta go to Portland, Maine? 9/10, Zero ...
(Added By SM)

Saturday, May 25, 2002

If you were an diabolical terrorist mastermind living in a cave in Afghanistan, around what place would you centre your evil terrorist plans? Of all the places you could choose as a base out of which to run your terrorism, would you pick Oklahoma City? From your cave, would you have even heard of Oklahoma City? Of course, Oklahoma City was the site of the 1995 attack on the Federal Building, an attack blamed on Timothy McVeigh (foolishly and suspiciously executed, thus removing his ability to give more evidence). At the time, however, there was considerable evidence that at least one man of Middle Eastern appearance was involved, and allegations that Arab terrorists were behind the attack, perhaps even terrorists working for Iraq. These issues were ignored by the McVeigh prosecutors, perhaps because they did not want to prejudice McVeigh’s prosecution by adding unnecessary complications, and perhaps because the Clinton administration was attempting, with considerable success, to blame attacks on the U. S. and on Clinton personally on a right-wing conspiracy, from which people like McVeigh were a logical outcome. Now, with the United States flailing away to find even the slightest excuse to attack Iraq, ideas that Saddam Hussein was behind the Oklahoma City terrorism havebeenresurrected. In fact, American writers are tryingtotiebothSaddamHusseinandbin Laden to the Oklahoma City bombing. As we shall see, I think a completely different view may be more likely. It is, to say the least, very odd how often Oklahoma City comes up in the recent history of terrorism:

  1. In June 2000, Atta and al-Shehhi (hijacker pilot of Flight 175) visited a flying school in Oklahoma City. They had a tour of the facilities at the school, and left. Supposedly, they then went to Florida and got flight training there, but we have to remember that Atta may have been in Florida taking flight training as early as April, so the official story is suspect. In any event, of all the places they could have taken flight training, they somehow decided to investigate Oklahoma City.
  2. Moussaoui, the so-called ’20th hijacker’, lived in Norman, a suburb of Oklahoma City, and attended flying school (Airman Flight School) there, all before moving to Minneapolis.
  3. Ihab Mohammed Ali, who was later named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya, also trained at the same school in Norman, Oklahoma.
  4. At the trial of Ramzi Ahmed Yusef, the principal organizer of the 1993 World Trade Center car-bombing, Abdul Hakim Murad testified that he was an al-Qaeda operative and had trained at Airman Flight School in order to prepare for a suicide hijack attack on CIA headquarters.
  5. An important piece of evidence in unravelling this mystery is the Israeli spy ring, and, in particular, its geographic locations in the United States. We know various Israeli spies were located all over the United States, but in particular: 1) across the river from the WTC at the time of the crashes, filming and cheering; 2) within blocks of where Atta and his colleagues were living in Hollywood Beach, Florida; 3) in Dallas, Texas, where in the days before September 11 the FBI raided the offices of a number of Islamic charities accused of supporting terrorism; and 4) most intriguingly, at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City (see paragraphs 175-177 of the report).
AQIM, Shabaab recall and praise 9/11 attacks | FDD's Long ...
(Added By SM)

It has been noted in variousplaces that after the Gulf War the Clinton administration settled thousands of Iraqi dissident refugees in various places, including some 2000 in Oklahoma City. Remember that Vreeland stated that in Moscow he saw a warning letter to Putin on terrorist attacks against the United States. The letter was written by a son of Saddam Hussein. It is possible that Saddam has spies in the anti-Saddam group of refugees in Oklahoma City who warned him of the upcoming terrorism. It is possible, as he couldn’t warn the U. S. directly, that he attempted to do so through Putin (if Saddam was behind September 11, why would he arrange for warning to be sent to Putin, who could not be relied on not to tell the Americans?). Putin did warn the U. S., and his warnings were apparently ignored. Is it possible that anti-Saddam refugees in Oklahoma City formed at least some of the group that was involved in the September 11 terrorism? The reason for the attack from the point of view of the Iraqis would be to provide an excuse for the United States to attack Iraq. This was so important a goal for these people that at least some of them may have been willing to die for it. When it happened, however, Saddam wasn’t directly blamed, as it was necessary to use the terror as an excuse for a limitless war on terror, securing oil reserves around the world. Al-Qaeda, supposedly a world-wide organization, was chosen as the scapegoat. The interesting thing is that the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing could have been a model for September 11, in that the Iraqis could have been involved in both attacks. They would not have been agents for Saddam – they would have been anti-Saddam refugees trying to frame Saddam to provoke a U. S. attack against him. When you think about it, if the Iraqis who settled in Oklahoma were refugees from Iraq, why does the American media jump to the conclusion that any Iraqi involvement must be by an agent of Saddam Hussein? Isn’t it much more likely that the involvement is by someone acting against the interests of Saddam? Of course, Saddam could have infiltrated the Iraqi refugees, bringing some pro-Saddam agents to the United States. It is much more likely, however, that any actions taken by this group would be intended to hurt the current Iraqi government. If you were looking for a group of actors who could speak Arabic, had the basic Middle Eastern appearance and the basic cultural knowledge to pass for Arab terrorists, and were so motivated with hatred for Saddam that they would sacrifice themselves to cause an excuse for a war to depose him, the people living around Oklahoma City may be just the actors you want. Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein may just be scapegoats to deflect attention from what is really going on, both with respect to the Oklahoma City bombing and September 11.AM0 comments

One thought on “THE 9/11 PSY-OPERA: ‘Atta Boy’, Mohamed Atta Is Everywhere (Flashback)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s