Source – naturalblaze.com
– “…Anyone obviously can see, and determine, that false and misleading vaccine information is NOT being promoted by “anti-vaxxer” websites! That’s the biggest fake news and propaganda the media, CDC/FDA and Big Pharma have been able to convince healthcare consumers into believing”
Time To Counterpunch Erroneous Pro-Vaccine Hype & Abuse – By Catherine J. Frompovich
If ever there were statistics to play “hard ball” with regarding vaccines and vaccinations, boy have I found a grouping, which I will counterpunch using CDC/FDA reported science papers, not “vaccine voodoo, consensus science.”
The chart below is taken from Journal of Communication in Healthcare Volume 9, 2016, Issue 3:
“What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? A content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment,” which states upfront in the article Abstract:
Anti-vaccine websites contain a considerable amount of misinformation, most commonly that vaccines are dangerous, cause autism and brain injury. Websites used both scientific evidence and anecdotes to support these claims. [CJF emphasis]
“We know from the example of the MMR vaccine and its now disproven link to autism in children that scaremongering can lead to a loss of public confidence and knee-jerk reactions that can lead to outbreaks of disease, she said.”
How about the various times the CDC/FDA called conferences to decide how to negate the scientific findings vaccines DO cause Autism? Simpsonwood Meeting in June 2000; the infamous William Thompson, whistleblower, admitting and providing thousands of files to Congressman William Posey as proof that the MMR vaccine caused Autism in young black boys less than three years of age, but CDC researchers had to destroy that data!
Vaccine acolytes, such as those who wrote the above article, often are not fully versed regarding the ‘universe’ in vaccinology, in particular, students in med school are not taught about the neurotoxic and other harmful chemical ingredients in vaccines, nor the potentialities for adverse health reactions. That, unfortunately, is left to practicing physicians to find out on their own from reading vaccine package inserts, which almost all never do, since they believe the propaganda-hype “vaccines are safe.”
Personally, I was aghast recently when I had an MD, highly credentialed, ask me what are vaccine excipients. I couldn’t believe my ears! I asked what he learned in med school about vaccines and his answer was not very much other than to believe Big Pharma’s hype.
How can CDC/FDA websites information be considered “misinformation” as opposed to affirmations? What don’t vaccine pushers and acolytes really get?
Below is my rebuttal to all vaccine pushers, at every level, regarding the factualness about vaccines and what may be regarded as their hyped safety status and capability for preventing diseases; check out “Confirmed: India’s Polio Eradication Campaign in 2011 Caused 47,500 Cases of Vaccine-Induced Polio Paralysis.”
However, recent research is indicating many partially- or fully-vaccinated individuals are the persons contracting those very diseases for which they have been inoculated.
Web Pages analyzed claiming % of “misinformation”:
62% found Vaccines are dangerous
Counterpunch: Read every vaccine package insert published by law http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/package_inserts.htm for all vaccines and refer to Sections: Contraindications; Warnings; Precautions; Adverse Reactions; Other
4% found Vaccines contain mercury
Counterpunch: Multiple dose vial vaccines still contain mercury [A vaccine containing 0.01% thimerosal as a preservative contains 50 micrograms of thimerosal per 0.5 mL dose or approximately 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose. See list of vaccines containing mercury on the FDA website: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/thimerosal-and-vaccines#cstat%5D
1% found mercury is dangerous
Counterpunch: EPA website https://www.epa.gov/mercury/health-effects-exposures-mercury Ethyl mercury in vaccines PubMed https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401210 Note the last sentence: “However, our knowledge on this subject is still incomplete, and studies are required to address the predictability of the additive or synergic toxicological effects of etHg and meHg (or other neurotoxicants).” What’s taking them so long?
Legal “wiggle-room” consensus science words to prove “safety”?
Added Counterpunch: CDC’s Verstraeten at Simpsonwood clandestine meeting re: mercury in vaccines [June 25, 2019 article]
6% found Vaccines contain thimerosal
Counterpunch: Refer to the above two counterpunches
1% found Thimerosal is dangerous
Counterpunch: Read the 42.1% found mercury is dangerous Counterpunch
3% found Vaccines weaken the immune system
Counterpunch: The CDC Trusted Source advises certain individuals should NOT receive specific vaccines https://www.healthline.com/health/vaccinations/immunization-complications
1% found Vaccines are ineffective
Counterpunch: “flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are well-matched to the flu vaccine.” https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm
This year’s flu shot is less than 50% effective in preventing infection, CDC says https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/14/health/flu-vaccine-effectiveness-cdc/index.html
6% found Vaccines are made from animal products
Counterpunch: Nothing less than the CDC’s Pinkbook of “Vaccine Excipient Summary” lists animal products for each vaccine, e.g., bovine serum albumin; egg proteins; Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell protein; recombinant human albumin; bovine calf serum; human albumin; 2% human serum albumin; hydrolyzed gelatin; calf bovine serum albumin; chicken protein; polygeline; fetal bovine serum;
Vero cell DNA from African green monkey. Mouse brain cells used to be listed but apparently have been ‘sanitized’ from the ingredient list.
11% found Vaccines are made from aborted human fetuses
Counterpunch: CDC’s Pinkbook of “Vaccine Excipient Summary” lists the various lines of “human diploid cells” used in the manufacturer of vaccines, e.g., MRC-5 cellular proteins; MRC-5 human diploid cells; MRC-5 cells including DNA and protein.
Note: HUMAN FETAL VACCINES
Informed Consent and Product Content Disclosure: Almost 92% of our children have been given vaccines made using human fetal cell lines, which are contaminated with human fetal cell DNA and a retrovirus. To date, 24 vaccines (10 of these are used in the US) contain components that are produced using human fetal cell lines. These cell lines are MRC-5 and WI-38 .
As an aside, please refer to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162048/ regarding genetically modified protein carriers.
So, anyone obviously can see, and determine, that false and misleading vaccine information is NOT being promoted by “anti-vaxxer” websites! That’s the biggest fake news and propaganda the media, CDC/FDA and Big Pharma have been able to convince healthcare consumers into believing!
However, instead of apologizing for their jaded actions, pro-vaxxers have taken a rabid stance demanding, while enabling, what’s called the USA medical police state. Don’t believe that? Just research how many states are enacting legislation to deprive vaccine exemptions, or even vaccinate children at “gunpoint”.
Furthermore, IF vaccines really were what they are hyped up to be, being fully vaccinated should not scare the pants off parents regarding unvaccinated children because they should KNOW their kids are ‘immunized’.
However, what does such moronic tactics really admit about the belief in vaccines and immunization?
Percentage of young U.S. children who don’t receive any vaccines has quadrupled since 2001
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice, plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer health issues researcher and holistic health advocate since the late 1970s; she continues researching and writing in retirement. Her career in holistic healthcare began in the early 1970s when she had to save, and restructure, her life resulting from having “fallen through the allopathic medical paradigm cracks.”