Source – ancient-origins.net
– “…The Malleus Maleficarium was indeed one of the factors that contributed to the popularity of the witch trials, and was likely to have claimed numerous lives over the centuries that it was used. Whilst the number of lives claimed by this book is debatable, some have regarded the Malleus Maleficarum as one of the “most blood-soaked works in human history”:
(The Malleus Maleficarum – A Medieval Manual for Witch Hunters)
The Salem witch trials, which began in 1692 in Salem Village, Massachusetts bay colony, are one of the most well-known and notorious witch trials in history. Yet, this was not the only case of these acts, as witch trials had been conducted in Europe for almost three centuries by then. This was due to the fear engendered by the perception that there was an ‘organized threat’ by satanic witches against Christendom. One of the products of this phenomenon was the Malleus Maleficarum, a work that dealt specifically with the prosecution of the so-called witches.
The “Approval” of the Malleus Maleficarum
The Malleus Maleficarum, which may be translated from Latin to English as the ‘Hammer of the Witches,’ was written in 1486 by a German Catholic clergyman by the name of Heinrich Kramer. Another man listed as the author of this treatise was Jacob Sprenger, though it is now believed that Sprenger contributed only his name and his authority as a leading professor of theology to this work. It may also be mentioned that both men belonged to the Dominican Order, and were Inquisitors.
Cover of the seventh Cologne edition of the Malleus Maleficarum, 1520. (Public Domain)
The Malleus Maleficarum was first published in Kramer’s home country in 1487, and was submitted to the University of Cologne’s Faculty of Theology in the same year, in order to obtain its endorsement. Although the book contains a Letter of Approbation from The Faculty of Theology of the University of Cologne, which indicates that it had successfully obtained the faculty’s certification, it is generally believed that Kramer’s request was rebuffed, and that the letter of approbation was actually a forgery.
Panorama of the main building, University of Cologne (CC-BY-SA-3.0)
It is also generally accepted that this work was banned by the Catholic Church three years after it was first published. It has been suggested, however, that the reported denouncement of Kramer in that year by the Inquisition has been mistakenly interpreted as a ban on the Malleus Maleficarum. Nevertheless, it is said that Kramer’s work became one of the most popular witch hunter manual during its time, and had gone through at least 13 editions by 1520. Furthermore, it has been pointed out that between 1574 and 1669, the Malleus Maleficarum was revived in 16 more editions.
New Editions of the Malleus Maleficarum
It has been argued that the contents of the Malleus Maleficarum presented nothing new on the subject of witchcraft. In addition, it has been pointed out that just as intimate a knowledge of this subject can be found in John Nider’s Formicarius, which was written nearly 50 years before the Malleus Maleficarum.
One of the reasons for the popularity of Kramer’s work was its reproduction by the printing press. Additionally, the “approval” by the University of Cologne served to further enhance the credibility of this piece of writing. Moreover, the “stigma it attached to witchcraft as a worse crime than heresy and in its notable animus against the female sex” made the Malleus Maleficarum a sensational work.
Illustration of a woman during a trial for witchcraft. (Public Domain) Women were mostly associated with practicing witchcraft.
Beneath the popularity of this book is a much darker and sinister heart. One scholar, for instance, wrote that the Malleus Maleficarum “rivals Mein Kampf as one of the most infamous and despised of books.”
The book is divided into three parts, the first being “Treating on the three necessary concomitants of witchcraft which are the Devil, a witch, and the permission of Almighty God”, the second being “Treating on the methods by which the works of witchcraft are wrought and directed, and how they may be successfully annulled and dissolved”, and the third being “Relating to the judicial proceedings in both the Ecclesiastical and Civil courts against witches and indeed all heretics”.
Illustration from 1892 of a witch trial. (Public Domain)
Kramer’s Questions
Much of the content of the Malleus Maleficarum may seem absurd and irrational to a modern reader. For instance, in the second part of the book, Kramer poses this question:
“And what, then, is to be thought of those witches who in this way sometimes collect male organs in great numbers, as many as twenty or thirty members together, and put them in a bird’s nest, or shut them up in a box, where they move themselves like living members, and eat oats and corn, as has been seen by many and is a matter of common report?”
He then provides this answer: “It is to be said that it is all done by devil’s work and illusion.”
A painting in the Rila Monastery in Bulgaria, condemning witchcraft and traditional folk magic. (Public Domain)
Though we may laugh at such claims today, the people who lived during Kramer’s time probably took such tales seriously. Thus, the prosecution of those suspected of being witches was thought to be necessary, and the meticulous exposition of this procedure can be found in the third part of the Malleus Maleficarum.
The Malleus Maleficarium was indeed one of the factors that contributed to the popularity of the witch trials, and was likely to have claimed numerous lives over the centuries that it was used. Whilst the number of lives claimed by this book is debatable, some have regarded the Malleus Maleficarum as one of the “most blood-soaked works in human history”.
Featured image: Burning witches and holding others in the Stocks, 14th century. Photo source: Public Domain.
By Ḏḥwty
References
Barclay, S., 2010. The Malleus Maleficarum. [Online]
Available at: http://www.historicmysteries.com/the-malleus-maleficarum/
Kramer, H. & Sprenger, J., Malleus Maleficarum [Online]
[Summers, M. (trans.), 1928. Kramer & Sprenger’s Malleus Maleficarum.]
Available at: http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org/downloads/MalleusAcrobat.pdf
Smith, M., 2002. The Flying Phallus and the Laughing Inquisitor: Penis Theft in the “Malleus Maleficarum”. Journal of Folklore Research, 39(1), pp. 85-117.
Thurston, H., 1912. Witchcraft. [Online]
Available at: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15674a.htm
Windhaven Network, 2015. The Malleus Maleficarum. [Online]
Available at: http://www.malleusmaleficarum.org/
www.history.com, 2015. Salem Witch Hunt begins. [Online]
Available at: http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/salem-witch-hunt-begins
 |
Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest. |
E-mail *
Spot on with this write-up, I truly assume this website needs rather more consideration. I’ll most likely be again to learn far more, thanks for that info.
I got this web page from my buddy who informed me about this web
site and at the moment this time I am visiting this site and reading very
informative posts at this place.
This piece of writing will help the internet users for setting up new web site or even a weblog
from start to end.
nice article,it is useful to me and others to know about this items,please just keep it….
Dear baby
The article is very helpful for me,i like it,thanks!
Everyone loves what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and exposure!
Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve included you guys to blogroll.
I will right away grab your rss as I can’t
find your e-mail subscription link or newsletter service.
Do you’ve any? Kindly permit me know in order that I could subscribe.
Thanks.
Heya! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new
apple iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts!
Carry on the outstanding work!
whoah this blog is fantastic i love studying your articles.
Keep up the good work! You know, many people are searching round for this information, you can aid
them greatly.
How many people can claim to have a copy of this book?
***This guy can, that’s one
I have noticed you don’t monetize your website, don’t waste your traffic, you can earn additional cash
every month because you’ve got high quality content.
If you want to know how to make extra money, search for: Boorfe’s
tips best adsense alternative
Hashish continues to be the most massively abused drug in The usa.
The arguments for and from the legalization of hashish have on to escalate.
This piece is not intended to set up the phase for a legalization discussion about marijuana.
Alternatively, I want warning practitioners whose customers underneath their care exam good for
cannabis. Hashish use is even so forbidden by Federal regulation and sufferers who self-medicate or abuse cannabis ought to not
be recommended controlled substances.
Regretably, several health professionals are normally faced with
the challenge of irrespective of whether or not or not to prescribe managed substances to sufferers who drug check constructive for
hashish. This is especially the circumstance in states that have
modified position out legislation to legalize cannabis.
These alterations in ailment legislation do not alter the Federal recommendations that
medical doctors need to observe. As a prior vocation DEA agent, I remind health care industry experts that cannabis is nonetheless an unlawful Agenda I
managed product with no recognized healthcare use in the U.S.
The truth of the matter stays that all condition rules have Federal oversight, as said in the Supremacy Clause of
the Constitution. “The Supremacy Clause is a clause in Shorter report VI of the U.S. Structure which dictates that federal legislation is the supreme law of the land. Beneath the doctrine of preemption, which is primarily based on the Supremacy Clause, federal legislation preempts point out legislation, even when the legislation conflict.”(1)
When a overall health practitioner will become experienced that a influenced man or woman is employing cannabis, alternate approaches of treatment should really genuinely be carried
out other than prescribing managed substances. Physicians need
to also acquire techniques to refer the influenced
person for treatment and cessation if any illegal drug use is discovered, including
cannabis. Doctors need to seriously also maintain in thoughts that the hashish produced now is considerably further strong than the
earlier and generating use of remarkable potency marijuana in conjunction with managed substances is
not safeguarded for victims.
Is there this type of a issue as Fda accepted health-relevant marijuana?
There are two Fda accredited prescription medication in the U.S.
made up of a synthetic analogue of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), which is the principal chemical
(cannabinoid) dependable for marijuana’s psychoactive outcomes.
A artificial edition of THC is contained in the Food and drug
administration accredited medications Marinol (Timetable III) and Cesamet
(Timetable II) which are advised to deal with nausea for most cancers men and women going through chemotherapy.
Marinol is also recommended to boost the urge for foods of most cancers and
anorexia shoppers (two). The Food and drug administration is at the instant overseeing trials having conducted on Epidiolex (three), a drug developed
by GW Pharmaceuticals and produced to minimize down convulsive seizures in little kinds.
The drug incorporates cannabinoids from cannabis, referred to as cannabidiol
or CBD, which does not incorporate the psychoactive qualities of conventional marijuana
and does not make a outstanding. If this drug gets Food items
and drug administration acceptance, it would make
history obtaining the to start with accredited drug made
up of CBD in the U.S.
Also, DEA has issued a one of a kind registration to a review laboratory at
the College of Mississippi to cultivate many strains of cannabis for medical trials (4).
This study will go on, but as of this composing, ingesting or cigarette smoking cigarettes botanical hashish
or the cannabis plant by itself is not federally accepted
as an approved health care remedy in the U.S.
People today who smoke or ingest hashish will need to be educated that they are breaking Federal legislation and could be prosecuted underneath Federal statutes.
On top rated of that, medical practitioners really need
to be exams for cannabis use and if detected,
they will need to not prescribe managed substances, irrespective of
their prognosis and the patient’s indications, as for each existing Federal
statutes.