Source – geopolitics.co
– “…The latest revelation by the whistleblower organization reveals Hillary Clinton was a director of, and received over $100,000 from, French industrial giant Lafarge, which was recently exposed as secretly sponsoring the Islamic State for profit”:
(Wikileaks Drops Most Devastating Bombshell vs Hillary Clinton)
The silence from the Lamestream Media is so deafening on this one.
There’s now a hard evidence Hillary Clinton to have received $100,000 from, and as the director of, a French industrial giant company LaFarge, which in turn, has been revealed as having links to the Islamic State terror enterprise.
The Clinton campaign, justice department and Lamestream Media have been parroting narratives that are contradicting each other.
They are all claiming that nothing’s wrong about Clinton’s private email servers. While at the same time, Clinton herself admitted the possibility of Russian hackers successfully obtaining top secret documents from the same servers.
Even so, they want us to focus not on the content of those emails, but on who possibly are responsible for the hack, which is truly not the people’s concern. For all its value, they are even grateful about the leaks.
Even the pseudo alternative medium Political Insider is speculating that Wikileaks itself may have a Russian connection.
“There’s a lot of reason to believe that Wikileaks is just a Russian espionage operation, which raises even greater concerns about the integrity of our elections.”
But let’s not kid ourselves and pretend that even their own NSA is not aware of what’s inside Clinton’s computers, because they do.
If their own institutions are that strong as they have been preaching about it all over the planet, why would they even raise concerns about some Julian Assange ruining the party?
In their undeniable panic, they are once again trying to shoot the messenger but not the message, because truth be told, the same message can stand by itself under public scrutiny.
What is at stake in this year’s US presidential elections is the fate of the planet. So, yes we are all concerned about America and what it has become.
We cannot allow a lying, bereft of conscience, and too ambitious sociopath Hillary Clinton to be at the seat of power holding the button of Armageddon.
WikiLeaks: Hacked Emails Prove Hillary ARMED JIHADISTS In Syria – Including ISIS
By: James Barrett
Fresh off of throwing the Democratic National Convention into turmoil after proving that party officials had conspired to sabotage Bernie Sanders’ campaign, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced that he has some even more damaging material in his trove of hacked emails — this time involving Hillary Clinton pushing to arm jihadists in Syria, including ISIS.
As Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft notes, in her testimony in January 2013 during the congressional Benghazi hearings, Clinton denied under oath having any knowledge of the weapons trade program with Syrian rebels that took place a year before the Benghazi attack. Now Assange says that in the collection of hacked emails his group has procured, 17,000 are “about Libya alone,” and among them is proof that Clinton “pushed” for weapons to be sent to “jihadists within Syria, including ISIS.”
“So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates,” Assange told Democracy Now Tuesday. “So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails.There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.”
Proof that the Democratic presidential nominee helped arm ISIS? Not exactly the kind of “experience” the Clinton campaign has been touting. And, of course, this is just more evidence that Clinton’s 2013 Benghazi testimony was riddled with lies.
During that testimony, Clinton told Sen. Rand Paul that she didn’t have “any information” on any weapons transfer program with insurgent groups in Turkey or elsewhere run out of Libya. Here’s the transcript (video below):
Paul: My question is, is the US involved in any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?
Clinton: To Turkey? I’ll have to take that question for the record. That’s, nobody’s ever raised that with me.
Paul: It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons. And what I’d like to know is, that annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries? Any countries, Turkey included?
Clinton: Well, Senator you’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. And, I will see what information was available.
Paul: You’re saying you don’t know?
Clinton: I do not know. I don’t have any information on that.
Last month, Assange told ITV that the information his group had obtained on Clinton could “proceed to an indictment.” While he says he has no intention of influencing the election in Donald Trump’s favor, Assange has made clear that he believes Clinton is a particularly dishonest politician.
“We do see her as a bit of a problem for freedom of the press more generally,” he told ITV. “She has a long history of being a liberal war hawk, and we presume she is going to proceed.”
The Clinton campaign’s attempt to blame Russia for the leaked DNC emails has also clearly irritated Assange, who blasted the campaign for it on NBC News. “In order to divert attention from proof that we published that the Sanders campaign was subverted within the DNC,” he said, “the Clinton campaign tries to take attention away from a very serious domestic allegation about election interference and try and bring in foreign policy.”
Now, Wikileaks is basically teaching the US justice department how to properly read and analyze all those leaked emails by comparing them with other sets of data that are already on the web…
WikiLeaks Exposes Hillary’s Stunning Connection to ISIS — Mainstream Media Blackout Ensues
Washington, D.C. – Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, claimed during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) that, “We have more material related to the Hillary Clinton campaign.”
Staying true to their word, WikiLeaks, with one simple tweet, dropped another bomb on the Clinton campaign – one so damaging it will almost surely be ignored by the mainstream media.
The latest revelation by the whistleblower organization reveals Hillary Clinton was a director of, and received over $100,000 from, French industrial giant Lafarge, which was recently exposed as secretly sponsoring the Islamic State for profit.
These latest revelations expose the deep relationship between Hillary Clinton and Lafarge — a company proven to be working with and funding ISIS. The information was released one week after a statement made by Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, during an interview with Democracy Now, implicated Clinton as being connected to arming terrorists.
According to an investigative report in The Canary by respected academic and journalist Nafeez Ahmed:
“Documents obtained by several journalistic investigations reveal that Lafarge has paid taxes to the terror group to operate its cement plant in Syria, and even bought Isis oil for years…
Lafarge also has close ties to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Apart from being a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation, Clinton herself was a director of Lafarge in the early 1990s, and did legal work for the firm in the 1980s. During her connection to Lafarge, the firm was implicated in facilitating a CIA-backed covert arms export network to Saddam Hussein.
Among its earliest benefactors was former First Lady and current presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton. From 1990 to 1992, Clinton served on Lafarge’s Board of Directors. Under her tenure, Lafarge’s Ohio subsidiary was caught burning hazardous waste to fuel cement plants. Clinton defended the decision at the time.
Then just before her husband, Bill Clinton, was elected president in 1992, Lafarge was fined $1.8 million by the Environmental Protection Agency for these pollution violations. Hillary Clinton had left the board of Lafarge in spring, just after her husband won the Democrat nomination. A year later, under Bill’s presidency, the Clinton administration reduced Lafarge’s EPA fine to less than $600,000.”
This type of quid-pro-quo is found to be common throughout the whole of the political apparatus in the U.S. However, it has become a specialty of the Clintons, a la the Clinton Foundation/State Department pay for play schemes, which we highlighted in a recent article.
The investigative report by The Canary goes on to reveal the nefarious nature of the Clinton/Lafarge connection:
In the late 1980s, according to an archived investigative report in the American Spectator, Hillary Clinton was connected to Lafarge when the firm was involved in facilitating CIA support for Saddam Hussein’s secret weapons programme.
The American Spectator report from November 1996 cited sources confirming that Hillary Clinton did legal work for Lafarge in the late 1980s before she became a director. The report also claimed that Lafarge’s US subsidiary:
“provided key services for the covert arms export network that supplied Saddam Hussein. To prevent exposure of that secret supply line, and collateral damage to Hillary Clinton – who joined Lafarge board in 1990, just as the arms pipeline was being shut down… the Justice Department was told to bury the investigation… But investigators from other US government agencies who worked on the case say they were ‘waved off’ whenever they got too close to exposing the direct involvement of the intelligence community in the arms export scheme.”
Lafarge remains close to the Clintons to this day. In 2013, Lafarge’s Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric Olson, was a ‘featured attendee’ at the Clinton Global Initiative’s annual meeting.
The company is a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation – the firm’s up to $100,000 donation was listed in its annual donor list for 2015. Lafarge is also listed again as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for the first quarter of 2016.
The dark reality of these connections to the Clinton apparatus should raise serious red flags, and must be brought to light for the American public to see.
The American people have a right to see the types of activities that have been carried out by Hillary Clinton and her cronies. Since the mainstream corporate media refuses to provide a modicum of in-depth investigative coverage of the nefarious deeds undertaken by the Clintons, it is up to citizens on social media to help awaken the sleeping masses.