Source – chemtrailsplanet.net
– “…In April 2016, the Google searches for “chemtrails” reached a higher point than we’ve ever seen. Supporting the idea that people are researching chemtrails more frequently because they are seeing them more frequently”:
NASA’s use of “Chemtrails” to describe deployment of chemicals as white lines in the sky has changed everything.
“Chemtrails” is recently revealed to be an appropriate word to describe “climate engineering”. The term “geoengineering” is confusing when it implies the government is doing something in secret to prevent global warming when the evidence shows the exact opposite.
Chemtrails and electromagnetic directed energies are creating global warming by altering warm and cold weather patterns.
Years ago, activists decided to use “geoengineering” in place of “chemtrails as an attempt to be “politically correct” but this was back in the days before NASA was discovered to use the term “chemtrails” to describe release of various chemicals into the atmosphere.
NASA’s use of Chemtrails to describe chemical lines in the sky has changed everything and validates the word “chemtrails” above “geoengineering” to describe “climate engineering” as a weapon of eco-terrorism. (Source)
In April 2016, the Google searches for “chemtrails” reached a higher point than we’ve ever seen.
Supporting the idea that people are researching chemtrails more frequently because they are seeing them more frequently, there seem to be seasonal peaks in the search statistics. You can test it for yourself at Google Trends here.
The highest peaks include:
- April 2004
- April 2007
- June 2008
- April 2009
- January 2011
- January 2012
- October 2012
- April 2013
- April 2014
- May 2015
- April 2016
From this we might be able to infer that geoengineering activity took place in spring or winter for the last several years.
The peaks of Google search activity for “geoengineering” occurred at many of the same points as for “chemtrails.”
Clifford Carnicom’s 2005 documentary Aerosol Crimes must have been a contribution to the first two spikes.
As we pointed out in “The Geoengineering Escalation of 2016,” we can measure and track geoengineering activity, and we should grip onto that and use that as something we can do about this. Let’s stay active.
We recommend taking pictures of the trails at every single opportunity: track them, make observations, communicate with people and let’s figure out how to deal with this threat to our health and prosperity as the free human beings we should be.
Please share this with as many people as possible.
Image Credit: David Dees
This article (Google Searches for “Chemtrails” Skyrocketed Last Month, Highest Ever) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Era of Wisdom.org.
USDA Insider Explains Chemtrails as Profitable “Investment Strategy
In this 1-hour plus video exclusive for Prison Planet.tv members, Peterson reveals how she was first spurred to investigate chemtrails after being alerted to them by someone at the Mendocino County Probation Department. Peterson then began to intensely study the phenomenon and note that aircraft producing the trails would circle the county in a clock-like loop, covering the entire area with a cloudy haze in as little as three hours. Peterson cites NASA studies showing that the chemtrails turn into man-made clouds, exacerbating artificial climate change. However, Peterson states her contention that NASA is attempting to cover-up the true nature of chemtrails and convince people that they are a natural phenomenon, a ruse dutifully parroted by top weather and satellite observatories, who as Peterson explains acknowledge the fact that man-made chemtrails are changing the weather yet still label them as natural weather fronts in their public broadcasts.
Peterson shows a map provided by the FAA which reveals how “intra-flights” – mainly of military origin – are causing the chemtrails by flying in loops around counties in flight paths that differ substantially from normal airline trajectories. The flights have no other obvious purpose than to disperse chemtrails because they have no fixed destination, they merely fly around and around in circles.
As proponents of geoengineering like Obama’s science czar John P. Holdren have proposed, blocking sunlight is a primary effect of chemtrailing, and sulphur could be one of the chemicals being dispersed by these trails. As Peterson explains, sulphur has been linked with a host of health problems, which is why California removed it from diesel fuel in the first place.
After studying water quality samples for the state of California stretching back some 30 years, Peterson found that starting from 1990, water sources were all registering unusual spikes in certain chemicals at precisely the same time, namely arsenic, barium, aluminum, calcium, manganese, magnesium, lead and iron. By measuring the spikes in these chemicals in the water supply with similar spikes in these chemicals in air quality samples, Peterson was able to conclude that the cause was airborne and that it had to be coming from the atmosphere. Peterson notes that mixing aluminum and barium creates clouds and that NASA experiments based around this concept were coinciding with the spikes in such chemicals measured in water and air quality samples.
This is an enlightening, detailed and documented explanation of how chemtrailing is being conducted, who is responsible for it and what the consequences are for our health and the environment.