Source – thearcanefront.com

– As the early 1900s boomed into American society, the leaders of American industry and government, on Wall Street and in Washington D.C., were facilitating a cultural shift from rural America to industrial America. Prior to that era, no one in America ever considered that it should be the government’s job to “create jobs”. The new job market burgeoned in the early 1900s by inducement from power brokers who, until the Internet, were largely unknown to the public at large. The “job culture” was assisted in its evolution by numerous persons in positions of power. Some of that power was aimed directly at the mind of the individual American, while some was aimed at the “group mind” (collective consciousness of all members in American society). On Wall Street, the mischief of the Rhodes Round Table group became popular even before the Paris Peace Accords of 1919, but accelerated swiftly throughout the 1920s and 1930s as Wall Street (and the City of London financial district) sought government complicity in regulating a society which was suddenly consuming new automobiles, electrical gadgetry, appliances, and other time-saving creations of science and industry at an astronomical rate. Mass-production techniques were funded by international financiers and power brokers, giving rise to, as John Taylor Gatto notes in his “Underground History of American Education”, the four “Great Coal Powers of the Nineteenth Century” ‒ Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Morgan. Having made fortunes in the industrial revolution, these four giants of capitalism morphed into “monopoly-capitalists”, and created the great tax-exempt foundations. They would use those foundations to mold a new America through the 20th century. As the Rhodes Round Table managed to take control of the Times of London, they quickly succeeded in influencing the largest players on Wall Street. One of the central planners in this was the House of Rothschild, which bankrolled J.P. Morgan from London coffers and helped finance other monopoly capitalists, such as the Harriman Brothers (partners with George Herbert Walker and his son-in-law, Prescott Bush). The Rhodes Round Table sank deep roots into Wall Street, and Wall Street “players” (many from old Tory family dynasties) would quickly learn how to manipulate Washington D.C. policy-making to their advantage. This group, organized by Sir Cecil Rhodes, is the cradle of Fabian socialism, and played a role in creating the world’s first communist nation ‒ Russia. Today, most Americans are unaware that the powers on Wall Street and in Washington D.C. actually financed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, deliberately giving rise to the first communist state. Until one understands why monopoly capitalists would want to establish a communist nation, one will have difficulty understanding why those same powers would later finance the rise of the Third Reich in Germany, while simultaneously seeking to subjugate the American taxpayer to unlawful government suppression. Part of the psychology behind early 20th century Wall Street and Washington D.C. was itself influenced by the writings of Charles Darwin and Karl Marx. By the early 1900s, Marx, Darwin, and Freud were influencing big business and big government. Many in that circle of power were directly involved with the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London and its sister group in America, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The “Progressive” movement first surfaced with a bang in the United States during the Woodrow Wilson administration, giving birth to the Federal Reserve System, and the federal income tax ‒ both frauds perpetrated on an unsuspecting American populace. Mixing Freud with Marx, and then stirring a bit of Darwin into the mix, the international financiers, led by the families of Warburg, Rothschild, Schiff, Barring, Kuhn, and Loeb, amongst others who followed the Rhodes doctrine of an English-speaking one-world government, worked with America’s new industrial lords ‒ Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Morgan ‒ to consolidate financial control over the American economy, in the best interests of the Bank of England and the European banking families who dominate it. At the core of it all was Fabian socialism, ushered in by the Rhodes Round Table group. That is how the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) originated in 1921. The Rhodes Round Table’s purpose, according to its founder, Cecil Rhodes, was/is to consolidate the English-speaking world into a global Federation via economic controls over the economies of developed nation-states, starting with the American economy. Created in 1891 in London, this plan was, in Sir Rhodes’ own words, to be a “secret society structured on the order of the Jesuits”. A quick fact-check on Cecil Rhodes reveals that he consolidated the South African goldmines for the House of Rothschild, and also created the De Beers Syndicate to regulate the world’s diamond market. He was a powerful and wealthy man, for whom Rothschild had a country in Africa named – Rhodesia. The Fifth Will and Testament of Cecil Rhodes reveals that Rhodes viewed America as being “stolen property” that rightfully belonged to the throne of England. But as King George had learned the hard way a century before, controlling Americans militarily was no easy task as long as Americans enjoyed universal gun ownership. So Rhodes and his leadership figured out how to dominate America, glean its wealth, and control its culture ‒ by clandestine economic means. To do this, these European financiers encouraged Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, and (especially) Morgan ‒ to consolidate economic power, create the tax-exempt foundations, move into the skillful art of manipulating the political class, and motivate a “work force” (workers of the world) which would drive the industrial revolution for the benefit of the power elite that largely controlled the world’s banking. The families of Rockefeller, Morgan, Carnegie, and Ford, along with their tax-exempt foundations, would harbor Marxism, Freudianism, and Darwinism as they funded the National Education Association, the American Medical Association, the American Historical Society, and indirectly, the U.S. Department of Education and other public-private “partnerships” which has led to the General Government in Washington D.C. turning the table on its rightful owners, “we the people”, by asserting unlawful dominance over individual citizens and state governments. The fact that the federal government (referred to as the “General Government” by the United States’ founders) is far outside its legal constitutional constraints has much to do with the deadly threats facing America’s sovereignty today. For example, nowhere in the U.S. Constitution is there any authorization for creating a U.S. Department of Education. That handiwork traces back to the exploits of the Rhodes Round Table group, the great tax-exempt foundations, and the “Long March” through America’s cultural and social institutions by cultural Marxism, which has been reinforced by John Dewey’s “Humanist Manifesto”. Of two serious attempts to format a world government, the post-WWI “League of Nations” and the post-WWII “United Nations”, one ‒ the United Nations ‒ survived, and, with the help of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama, is on the threshold of complete dominance on a global scale. All standing in its way is the U.S Constitution. Americans who sense that their way of life is shifting right out from under them should know there is ample historical evidence to confirm their assertions are accurate. Then President George H.W. Bush did indeed sign the United States onto the United Nations’ Agenda 21 back in 1992 (Congress was not consulted). Every President since then has only help strengthen Agenda 21′s grip on the United States. Barack Obama himself has raised the gavel and brought to order a meeting of the United Nations’ Security Council ‒ an overt act of treason and oath-breaking for which he’s yet to be challenged by a largely ignorant and apathetic constituency. Had the American people any clue about the sinister nature of the meeting held at Jekyll Island, Georgia, in 1910, which gave birth to the Federal Reserve System, the bill created there would have never been passed into law, and Americans would today hold much more personal freedom than the current General Government permits. Had the American people understood that the purpose of the new federal “income tax” was to use the working American taxpayer as guarantor of the interest on the debt that the Federal Reserve System would create for the federal government, there would be no 16th Amendment, and no Federal “income tax” today. It’s important to note that for more than a century the United States functioned honorably and peacefully without a federal income tax, which was first implemented in 1913 for purposes concealed from Americans intentionally. It is evident that public apathy has existed for a century or more, and it can be said that this apathy has been nourished by furnishing to the average American the creature comforts, conveniences, and constitutional concessions that have helped facilitate the plight of American society with the passing of time. In conclusion, Edward Bernays, nephew to Sigmund Freud, is generally recognized today as the “father of public relations” in American universities. Bernays used his uncle’s theories about the subconscious and its subliminal, primal urges and compulsions to reinvent “advertising” for Wall Street. Washington D.C. quickly bought into Bernays’ system of “public relations”, finding that with proper knowledge of how the “group mind” (the collective psyche of America) differs in activity from the mind of the individual, government could succeed in swaying public perception towards accepting policies that help expand the role and authority of government… “The systemic study of mass psychology revealed to students the potentialities of invisible government of society by manipulation of the motives which actuate man in the group. Trotter and Le Bon, who approached the subject in a scientific manner, and Graham Wallas, Walter Lippmann, and others who continued with searching studies of the group mind, established that the group has mental characteristics distinct from those of the individual, and is motivated by impulses and emotions which cannot be explained on the basis of what we know of individual psychology. So the question naturally arose: If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?” ‒Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” People will generally accept just about anything, if it is introduced gradually…