Scource – scribd.com
– The official story of September 11th is like a bag full of lies and this seems to be a provenfact for the alternative community. What did really happen? A new series of revelationsfrom a former member of the Russian nuclear intelligence has shocked even the oneswho believed to have a clear view behind the curtain.
Dimitri Khalezov
How exactly did the WTC buildings collapse? The analysis work of anexpert for nuclear explosions leads us to a shocking conclusion.
When ordinary people saw how two planes struck the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center inNew York and how the Twins Towers then collapsed in clouds of dust during 9/11 events, theywere too shocked by the incidents to subject the events to any level of scrutiny. Since then, thestrange notion has been embedded into the people’s minds: that hollow aluminum planes couldallegedly penetrate thick steel buildings in their entirety, and that aviation fuel (kerosene) couldallegedly “melt” these steel buildings into fluffy microscopic dust…Sooner or later, these ridiculous notions have to be discarded. The Twin Towers’ collapse hadabsolutely nothing to do with any planes or with any fires allegedly caused by the “planes”. This isan obvious fact that occupies minds of millions of Americans who are unhappy with the officialinterpretation of the World Trade Center’s destruction for the last 6 years, at least. When theinitial shock caused by the 9/11 events subsided, many people began to realize thatinconsistencies in the official version were simply too many.First; what attracted their attention was that the order in which the Twin Towers collapsed did notcorrespond to the order in which they were struck by the planes. The South Tower which was hit

3
second, collapsed first, and the North Tower that was hit first, collapsed second.Thismeans thatit took for the “fires” 1 hour and 42 minutes “to collapse” the first Tower and only 56 minutes – tocollapse the second Tower. Considering that the fires in both Towers were caused byapproximately same quantities of kerosene and considering that the Towers were Twins (i.e.absolutely identical in their strength), it was the first clear indication that their collapse had nothingto do with the fires. The next realization came when the 9/11 researchers began to consider thatthe World Trade Center building #7 (an enormously strong modern metal-frame type 47 storieshigh skyscraper) also collapsed in similar manner late afternoon the same day, but without beinghit by any plane. If the collapse of the Twin Towers was officially blamed on kerosene allegedlycarried by the “planes”, the collapse of the WTC-7 was unexplainable to such an extent that theofficial Report of the 9/11 Commission preferred not to mention building #7 collapse at all – as if the collapse of a 47-stories high modern skyscraper was not worth mentioning. Comparison of these three events and a lot of irregularities surrounding their collapse brought the first 9/11researchers to the realization that they were being cheated by authorities and the World TradeCenter destruction had anything to do neither with kerosene, nor with the “planes”, because theplanes were
not actually needed
. The mere collapse of the WTC building 7 late afternoonSeptember 11, 2001, proved that the actual terrorist planes were redundant and the collapse of the World Trade Center would occur in any case – irrespective of any “planes”. Someone simplyneeded the World Trade Center to collapse and that is why it collapsed. From this point the so-called “9/11 Truth Movement” has started.People then began to accuse the US Government of intentionally demolishing the World TradeCenter in an industrial process known as a “controlled demolition”. More and more people inAmerica started also to accuse their own government of being the main culprit behind the 9/11attacks and eventually more than 65% of the US population expressed their disbelief into theofficial explanation of the 9/11 attacks and of the World Trade Center’s collapse. In fact,everybody who watched the contemporary 9/11 coverage attentively enough could remember these screen pictures where the “third explosion” was mentioned:And, understandably, the most of the people who disagree with official “kerosene” theory, accusethe US Government of intentionally demolishing the World Trade Center. However, they do nothave much understanding about demolition processes in general and of the World Trade Center’sactual construction in particular. That is why quite a few “conspiracy theories” appeared thatrange from claims that the WTC was allegedly “wired with explosives” to claims that it wasallegedly demolished by so-called “nano-thermite” (a mystic substance hitherto unheard of) thatwas allegedly “used as a coating” of any and every metal piece of the Twin Towers’ bearingstructures. There are even more bizarre conspiracy theories that blame the Twin Towers’collapse on alleged “high-tech weapons” – such as alleged laser beams originating from space,for example. Of course, none of these conspiracy theorists can agree with each other and spendtheir time not only accusing the US Government of being allegedly the main culprit behind 9/11,but also accusing each other of “muddying the waters of the truth”. The problem of all these

4
conspiracy theorists in general, however, is that they do not know what really happened with theWorld Trade Center and, most importantly, they don’t know
why
it so happened.The author of this article will try to present to his reader something different. Instead of presenting just another “conspiracy theory” he will present expert opinion in addition to his eyewitness’testimony along with his experience and knowledge from his former position in the Soviet Army.As a result of this approach, I hope, the reader will get far better explanation in regard to the WTCdemolition that he or she could encounter on any specialized forum on the Internet that is dealingwith the 9/11 conspiracy.
Ground Zero and ground zero.
To begin with I would like to remind everyone that the spot of the former World Trade Center inNew York is called in English “Ground Zero”. Many people seem not to realize what these words“ground zero” actually mean and how important is evidence which they represent. Many just took“Ground Zero” for a proper noun – as if it were a name of a city or a name of a ship. However, notmany people remember today that the strange name “ground zero” was assigned to the spot of the former WTC way too quickly to be a “Proper Noun”. Almost immediately after the TwinTowers’ collapse (a few hours before the collapse of the WTC-7) – i.e. by noon time September 11, 2001, almost all officials and even some news reporters have began to refer to the area as“ground zero”. All news releases printed the next day too called the spot of the former WTC as“ground zero” and these strange words were still spelled by then with low-case letters. This usageof “ground zero” in relation to the former WTC area continued throughout September 12, 2001,and some news agencies continued using “ground zero” in low-case letters even throughoutSeptember 13, 2001.Only then, as if someone has realized his mistake, this strange name hasbeen suddenly elevated in status to become “Ground Zero” with Capital Letters and as such it, atlast, became the Proper Noun. But what about “ground zero” with low case letters – i.e. not in astatus of the Proper Noun yet?Why would they call the WTC spot almost immediately after the Towers’ collapse by such strangewords? Was it a mistake caused by a confusion in the midst of the unprecedented 9/11 events? Icould answer “yes”. It was definitely a mistake caused by the general confusion. It was nothowever a mistake in the sense that the wrong name has been selected to call the WTC spot –simply because it was too early at that moment to figure out the proper name. In fact, the CivilDefense specialists were absolutely right when they designated the area as “ground zero”. Therehas been absolutely no mistake in such a designation. It was indeed “ground zero” in a sense theCivil Defense understood it. It was absolutely a mistake in the sense that these strange words“ground zero” were inadvertently leaked to journalists and through them – to the general public.After that it became simply too late to quash this strange Civil Defense designation and thedesperate US officials had no choice afterwards than to “Capitalize” these seditious words and toconvert the proper Civil Defense’s designation into the Proper Noun.To begin with, I would like here to quote a statement concerning one of the 9/11 heroes –Detective John Walcott, a “Ground Zero” responder, who spent a considerable amount of time inthe WTC site cleaning the rubble of the World Trade Center. He spent enough time there todevelop a strange disease: acute myelogenous leukemia in its terminal form. Just two paragraphsof this statement from a scary article “
Death by Dust
”
1
managed to contain and to reveal to uspractically all those “unexplainable” strange things – which the reader will need as a basicpremise to understand the main point of this article – both about dust and about radiation:
“…Because Walcott was a detective, he ended up spending his five-month stint not just at Ground Zero, but also at Fresh Kills. As much as he choked on the Lower Manhattan air,
1
The entire story from which I am quoting is here:http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0648,lombardi,75156,2.html