A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on  9-11.

Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming “middle-eastern” men with a white  van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)

“They were like happy, you know  … They didn’t look shocked to me” said a witness. (3)

Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses  saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high  fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)

One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New  York’s bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were  mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here’s the transcript from NBC News:

(*Writer’s note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these “Arabs” were Palestinians?  How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not “sheikh uniforms”)

Based on that phone call,  police then issued a “Be-on-the-Lookout” alert for a white mini-van heading for the city’s bridges and tunnels  from New Jersey.

According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering  Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

The police and FBI field agents became  very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items  that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the  Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled  explosives. (11)

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it  approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here’s what the  Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge.  The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the  terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (13) “…two suspects are in FBI  custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge … The FBI …  says enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge.” WMV video download (545kB)

It was reported the van contained tonnes of explosives (14).

What’s  really intriguing is that ABC’s 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey  Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,  which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz  Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as  clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George  Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may  actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the  conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible  eye-witnesses all saw celebrating “middle-easterners” in a white van in so many different locations. It also  explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three  Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a  bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If  a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a  “get-away van” to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major  crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that  anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 “mystery caller”. A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story gets becomes  even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems.An American  employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were  Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System’s Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and  fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System’s  customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (21).

The Jewish weekly The Forward reported that the FBI finally concluded that at least two of the  detained Israelis were agents working for the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and that Urban Moving  Systems, the ostensible employer of the five Israelis, was a front operation. This was confirmed by two former  CIA officers, and they noted that movers’ vans are a common intelligence cover. (23). The Israelis were held in custody for 71 days  before being quietly released. (24)

wmv video download

It  doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents – here’s the most  logical scenario:

Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9/11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing  anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1 CIA Director George Tenet  said “You know, this has bin Laden’s fingerprints all over it.” (27)

The compliant mainstream  media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled  with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, “experts”, and scribblers of every stripe  spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.

We were  told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our “freedom” and “democracy”. The  Muslims were “medieval” and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about  the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!

But bin  Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the 9-11 attacks.  The BBC published bin Laden’s statement of denial in which he said:

You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?

Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:

To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur  video that the Pentagon just happened to find “lying around” in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very  fake. (33)

There is no evidence, be it hard or  circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda “terrorist network” to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs  for terror plots against America.

If the sovereign foreign government mentioned by Senator Graham was an enemy of the United States the  “compelling evidence” would not be kept secret for 20+ years.

One final point; at 09:40 on 9-11 it  was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks  (35). This claim was  immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed “terror attacks on  civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories.” (36)

Why  would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (37)  make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?

The implication of Palestinians in the 9/11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to  achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.

US official quoted in Carl  Cameron’s Fox News