– Rudolf Hess, Adolf Hitler’s Deputy Fuehrer, and Nazi  Party Reichsleiter, was indeed murdered by British agents  according to a document recently obtained under Great Britain’s equivalent of  the Freedom of Information Act. But….read the article closely and  carefully!:

Adolf  Hitler’s Nazi deputy Rudolf Hess ‘murdered by British agents’ to stop him  spilling wartime secrets

There is something highly suggestive in this article, which, when closely  read, does not actually state that British agents murdered Hess, but rather,  that various investigative organs of the British government investigated the  claims of a surgeon who claimed that he had been murdered. But,  that’s not the highly suggestive thing to note in this article:

“Released under the Freedom of Information Act, the partially-redacted report  by Detective Chief Superintendent Howard Jones revealed that the surgeon – Hugh  Thomas – had supplied him with the names of two suspects provided by a  “government employee” responsible for training secret agents.

“Withheld for nearly 25 years, the report has been released by the Yard’s  counter-terrorism command following consultation with ‘other Government and  foreign government departments’.” (Emphasis added)

Say that again please?

What possible connection could an investigation into the death  of Rudolf Hess have to do with contemporary counter-terrorism  issues?

Well, for those who’ve been following my research, or that of a few others,  there is a connection between radical Islamicism, radicial Muslim  terrorism, and the Nazis. We need not recount here the connections to Nazis that  spiral out from the overthrow of King Farouk by CIA-sponsored SS Lt. Colonel  Otto Skorzeny, General Wilhelm Farmbacher, and so on. Nor need we recount the  connections of the SS to the Muslim Brotherhood itself, to the Grand Mufti of  Jerusalem during the war, nor to his cousin, Yasser Arafat. We  need not recount the fact that it was German translations of  the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion that  were translated – by Nazis – into Arabic.

We needn’t recall all that, because the article is suggesting – tiptoeing  around the implication, in fact – that there is some contemporary significance to all these connections, and they, in turn, to the death of Rudolf  Hess, who took whatever secrets he had with him to his grave…

The mystery surrounding the man is labyrinthine. Was the prisoner in Spandau  even the real Hess? Some do not think so, and there’s a bit of evidence to make  their case at least worthy of mention and consideration. The man in Spandau  prison apparently lacked  war wounds Hess suffered during  World War One, and which became a part of his personal file in the Imperial  German Reichsheer. So the man in Spandau who was murdered was a double?  If he was a double, say those who advocate that he was the real  Hess, then he was so good of a double he fooled Hess’s son Wolf and Frau Hess  herself.

Which brings us to the central core of the mystery: why keep  Hess locked up for so long? And then, when it looked as if Gorbachev was no  longer going to allow the Soviet Union to play “bad cop” by constantly vetoing  calls for his release, why, after that change of heart, was he murdered? (And  this author believes he was murdered.)  One scenario has it  that Hess flew his now infamous “peace mission” to Great Britain in May of 1941  – scarcely a month before the massive Nazi invasion of Russia in Operation  Barbarossa – to offer peace to the British and a role in a Europe-wide crusade  against international Bolshevism. This version of events has it that Hess was  given this mission by Adolf Hitler himself, with the caveat that “in the event  that you are caught or killed, the Fuehrer will disavow any knowledge of your  actions.” Mission Impossible. The bona fides to establish Hess’s sincerity?  Again, according to this version of events, Hess brought with him the entire  Order of Battle for the upcoming invasion of the Soviet Union.

It sounds nice, except it makes no sense. Why keep Hess locked up to preserve  a secret (the Order of Battle), which is now fully known, to an invasion that  failed? And why keep him locked up to preserve the political secret which, in any event, the British rejected? The Barbarossa scenario makes  no sense.

Then there’s the Antarctic scenario, one to which I am more strongly  inclined. Hess was, along with Reichsmarschall Herman Goering, the sponsor of  the 1938-1939 German Antarctic expedition, the one that allegedly found warm  water springs, and vast under-the-ice caves for u-boat bases and so on. It is a  curious fact that little more than this is known of the German  Antarctic expedition to this day, and in that absence, all sorts of scenarios  have abounded, including fanciful tails of secret Nazi Antarctic research bases  building flying saucers and chasing Admiral Richard Byrd’s Operation High Jump  out of the polar continent with his tail between his legs… with Nazi Flying  Saucers of course. I’ve always reject the flying saucer aspect of this “last  battalion” legend, and rejected the idea that the Nazis had some sort of postwar  research and production facility there. In the absence of any firm evidence to  indicate that they did, all the other evidence points to South  America as the home and haven to their postwar research projects, not  Antarctica.

Regardless of how one shaves this ice-cube, however, the fact remains that  Hess would have known something about the expedition. But what  could it be that would cause him to be kept under such close guard for the rest  of his life, and then murdered when it looked like the Soviets were going to  drop their veto against his release under Premier Gorbachev?

Now, in this article, the dim outlines of another scenario begin to offer  themselves, namely, that Hess knew something about postwar plans and Nazi intentions with terrorism and the Islamic world